Most conversations disappear. We have them, we move on, and within days much of what was said is gone. But every now and then, a conversation sticks. You remember where you were, what was said and sometimes even exactly how you felt. Those conversations become reference points in our lives and, often without realising it, we return to them when we think about who we were, what we believed and how much we have changed.
As leaders, we can leave those moments entirely to chance, or we can become more deliberate about recognising and creating them. I call this memory marking. Memory marking is the deliberate act of identifying a moment, conversation, statement or feeling and giving it a marker that allows us to return to it later. The real power isn’t simply remembering the conversation. It is being able to return someone to an earlier version of their thinking and compare it with where they are now.
Why Mark a Memory?
Leadership is often about helping people see something in themselves before they can see it themselves. A teacher might be considering leadership for the first time, a beginning leader might be questioning whether they are capable, or someone might have just navigated an incredibly difficult situation without recognising what it says about their capability. In those conversations, we sometimes get a glimpse of the gap between how someone currently sees themselves and what they might eventually become.
Imagine sitting with an aspiring leader who tells you they don’t think they’re ready for the next step. You could reassure them, give them advice and move on. Alternatively, you could recognise that this might be a moment worth returning to and say, “I want you to remember this conversation. Right now, you don’t believe you’re ready. I think you are, and when you get that first leadership position, we’re coming back to this conversation.”
You have now created a reference point. Months or even years later, when that person has stepped into leadership, you can return them to that conversation and ask what they remember, what they believed about themselves then and what they believe now. Their growth is no longer something you need to convince them of. They have two versions of themselves to compare.
How Do You Actually Mark a Memory?
Memory marking doesn’t require a dramatic speech or a perfectly constructed leadership moment. In fact, it is often most powerful when it emerges naturally from an ordinary conversation. The skill is recognising that something significant has just been said or experienced and deciding that this may be worth returning to.
The first thing I try to do is interrupt the normal flow of the conversation. If someone has just said something important, I don’t immediately move to the next question or begin giving advice. I might say, “Hang on, I want to stop you there,” and then draw their attention back to their own words. That small interruption changes the rhythm of the conversation and signals that what has just happened deserves more attention.
The next step is to identify what is worth marking. It might be a statement about capability, a prediction, a fear, a commitment, a decision or even an emotion. Someone might say, “I don’t think I could ever be a deputy,” or, “I’m terrible at difficult conversations.” Those statements give you something concrete to return to because they capture what that person believes about themselves at that particular point in time.
Then you create an anchor. The best anchors are usually simple. It might be their exact words, a phrase you both use, a question, the place where the conversation occurred or a prediction about what might happen next. The purpose of the anchor is not to make the conversation theatrical. It is simply to give the memory a retrieval point so that when you return to it later, both of you know exactly what moment you are talking about.
The final part is the most important: return to the marker. Memory marking loses much of its value if we create markers but never revisit them. When circumstances have changed, deliberately bring the original conversation back and use it as the starting point for reflection. Ask what has changed, what the person has learned and what they now understand about themselves that they couldn’t see at the time.
Intentional Memory Marking
There are two different ways I use memory marking. The first is intentional memory marking, where the other person knows explicitly that I am marking the moment and that I intend to return to it.
I might say, “I want to mark what you just said because we’re going to come back to this conversation,” or, “Remember how you’re feeling right now. In six months, I want us to talk about this again.” Both people know a marker has been placed. In some ways, you are creating a small agreement with their future self that this moment will become a point of comparison.
Intentional memory marking is particularly useful when you want someone to consciously recognise their current thinking. If a teacher tells you they could never lead a team, someone is nervous about accepting a new role, or a developing leader doubts whether they are ready, making the marker explicit encourages them to notice what they currently believe about themselves.
There is another benefit to intentional marking. The person knows you are going to come back to the conversation. That anticipation can cause them to notice things between the marker and the return. They may recognise small successes, question their original assumptions or become more conscious of their own development. In that sense, the marker doesn’t simply capture a memory; it can become part of the person’s learning.
Covert Memory Marking
The second approach is covert memory marking. In this situation, the person doesn’t necessarily know that I have identified something they have said as a moment worth returning to. I notice the statement, belief, emotion or decision and quietly place a marker beside it.
Someone might say, “I’m just not very good at having difficult conversations.” Rather than immediately telling them that I am marking the statement, I might simply ask, “What makes you say that?” We explore their thinking and the conversation continues. I remember the statement, or where appropriate make a brief note for myself, because I think there may be value in returning to it later.
Six months later, after watching that person successfully navigate several difficult conversations, I can bring the marker back: “Do you remember telling me that you weren’t very good at difficult conversations?” What follows can be a very different conversation because the person now has evidence that challenges the belief they held about themselves.
Covert marking isn’t about manipulating someone, catching them out or secretly engineering an emotional response. It simply means that the leader doesn’t announce the marker at the time. You are noticing and retaining something meaningful that has naturally emerged so that, if the right opportunity presents itself, you can help the person return to it.
Why Do We Need Both?
If intentional memory marking works, it would be easy to think we should simply announce every important moment. The problem is that if everything is marked, nothing is marked. Constantly telling people, “Remember this moment,” would quickly feel artificial and could actually reduce the significance of the occasions when you genuinely want someone to stop and pay attention.
There are also conversations where announcing the marker would change the conversation itself. Someone may be thinking aloud, expressing uncertainty or revealing something about how they currently see themselves. Telling them immediately that you intend to remember their statement and bring it back later might make them self-conscious or cause them to defend a position that was really just part of their thinking at that moment.
Covert marking allows the conversation to remain natural. The person continues to work, learn and develop without consciously waiting for you to revisit what they said. When you eventually return to the marker, the contrast between their original belief and what they have subsequently demonstrated can be incredibly powerful.
Intentional marking serves a slightly different purpose because the anticipation of returning is part of the process. Sometimes I want the person to know that we’re coming back. I want them to carry the conversation with them, notice what happens next and perhaps even question their original thinking as new experiences occur.
Knowing which one to use comes down to purpose. If I want someone to consciously carry the moment forward, I am more likely to mark it intentionally. If I want to preserve the natural flow of the conversation and quietly capture something that may become meaningful later, I may mark it covertly. Both approaches lead to the same destination, but they take different paths to get there.
Mark It. Anchor It. Return to It.
The whole process can be reduced to three actions: mark it, anchor it and return to it. Marking means recognising that something worth remembering has happened. Anchoring means attaching that moment to something retrievable, particularly the person’s own words, beliefs, emotions or decisions. Returning means deliberately bringing the memory back when there is something meaningful to compare it against.
The return is where much of the power sits. Imagine a teacher telling you, “I could never lead a team.” Twelve months later, that same teacher has successfully led a project, facilitated meetings and stepped into an acting leadership role. You return to the marker and ask, “Do you remember telling me that you could never lead a team?”
The temptation as a leader is to follow that with, “See, I told you.” But that misses the point. A better question is, “What did you believe about yourself then, and what do you know about yourself now?” You don’t need to explain their growth to them. The comparison allows them to see it themselves.
The Psychology Underneath It
Memory marking isn’t a formal psychological term. It is language I use to describe a leadership practice that connects with several things we know about memory. We don’t remember every experience equally. Distinctive experiences can stand out, emotion can increase the significance we attach to an experience, attention influences what we encode, and contextual cues can help us retrieve memories later.
That is why deliberately interrupting the flow of a conversation can matter. When you say, “Hang on, I want you to remember what you just said,” you are directing attention towards the moment itself. When you repeat someone’s exact words, you provide an anchor. When you return to those words months later, you provide a retrieval cue that can reconnect the person with their original thinking.
There is also something powerful about comparison. Human growth can be difficult to see while it is happening because it is often gradual. A person who has developed enormously over twelve months may not feel dramatically different from the person they were yesterday. Returning them to a specific moment from twelve months earlier gives them a clearer point of comparison.
It Isn’t About Being Right
There is an important ethical distinction in how memory marking should be used. It shouldn’t become an opportunity for the leader to prove that they were right, nor should covert marking become a way of storing someone’s words to use against them later. The leader shouldn’t be the hero of the memory; the other person should be.
Instead of saying, “See, I told you that you’d be good at this,” ask, “Think about what you believed about yourself when we had that conversation. What do you know about yourself now that you didn’t know then?” That change moves the conversation away from the leader’s prediction and towards the person’s developing understanding of their own capability.
Memory marking also needs to be selective and authentic. Not every conversation deserves a marker and not every marker needs to be returned to. The skill is recognising those moments where someone’s words, emotions, decisions or beliefs might become important to who they are becoming and having the discipline to notice them.
Leaders Create Memories Whether They Intend To or Not
People remember conversations with leaders. They remember the leader who believed in them, but they can also remember the leader who embarrassed them. They remember conversations that gave them the courage to apply for something, feedback that changed their practice, and sometimes a sentence that seemed insignificant to the person who said it but stayed with them for years.
That means our words carry weight. Memory marking is about becoming more deliberate with that responsibility. Sometimes we should stop the conversation and say, “I want you to remember this.” At other times, our role is simply to listen closely enough to recognise a moment worth quietly holding onto and returning to when the time is right.
Perhaps that is one of the less obvious roles we play as leaders. We don’t just help people work out where they are going; sometimes we help them remember where they started. The marker gives us somewhere to return to. The return gives us a comparison. And the comparison helps make growth visible.
Michael Patane
The Primary Principal - Michael Patane 
Leave a comment